Feedback for "Charlie George responds to `All truth is relative`"
(View the rubric for this assignment in a new tab.)
You are not the first poster to respond  to this post.
Degree of Difficulty Multiplier: .7 Depending on how tricky I think your topic or issue is, you'll get more (or less...) credit for your post. Check out this page for more explanation.
How well has the post’s project & goal been presented?
- The focus apparently changes throughout the post. [Unacceptable; 0]
How relevant is your post to the target?
- Discusses the same general topic as the target, but is otherwise not related. [Marginal; 1]
How well did you show & share your understanding of the concept?
- Applies the concept clearly to the issue with only a few minor simplifications or inaccuracies. [Good; 2]
How well did you explore intuitions about knowledge?
- Contradictory or confusing statements about your thinking makes it difficult to see how this post affected your views [Marginal; 1]
Was the post effectively woven into the wiki with sufficient key concepts?
- No (find some more...) 
Was the reference source for this post correctly linked-to?
- Yes 
Key areas to improve, if you want to revise this:
|OK, a good start Charlie.
So, overall... needs some work especially in terms of bringing together the Price stuff with the atheism stuff. And there are a few things that need more discussion to make them transparent. I think if you had a clear thesis at the start, that would help focus & contextualize your discussions. (The .7 DoD is mainly because of the basic nature of the Price quote that you're basing this on... bring in some more complicated dimensions to bring that up.) Add in some more concepts... I can see terms you use not included.
Total points earned (to date!): 3.8 This is auto-calculated... but email me if it's wrong!
You can check the 'View History' tab of this page, to see old feedback.
|Privacy Advisory: this page will be deleted after the course.|
There will be no way for observers to access this feedback.