Feedback for "Herbert Chapman responds to `Gravity Exists`"
You are FIRST!!1! to this post.
Degree of Difficulty Multiplier: .8 Depending on how tricky I think your topic or issue is, you'll get more (or less...) credit for your post. Check out this page for more explanation.
How well has the post’s project & goal been presented?
- The post’s goal is clearly stated, with some awareness of context or related issues. [Good; 2]
How relevant is your post to the target?
- Explicitly addresses a specific key assumption or claim in the target post as the central issue. [Excellent; 3]
How well did you show & share your understanding of the concept?
- Uses the issue to display the key aspects of the concept clearly and accurately. [Excellent; 3]
How well did you explore intuitions about knowledge?
- Clearly reflected on and evaluated the concept’s impact on your intuitions about knowledge [Excellent; 3]
Was the post effectively woven into the wiki with sufficient key concepts?
- Yes 
Was the reference source for this post correctly linked-to?
- Yes 
Key areas to improve, if you want to revise this:
|Solid. You don't need to pretend to like Descartes, if you end up at the end siding with your classmate and that this should count as real knowledge.|
Total points earned (to date!): 11.8 This is auto-calculated... but email me if it's wrong!
You can check the 'View History' tab of this page, to see old feedback.
|Privacy Advisory: this page will be deleted after the course.|
There will be no way for observers to access this feedback.